//]]>
Normal View MARC View ISBD View

Niels Bohr's Complementarity

by Katsumori, Makoto.
Authors: SpringerLink (Online service) Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 0068-0346 ; . 286 Physical details: XIV, 178 p. online resource. ISBN: 9400717482 Subject(s): Philosophy (General). | Science %History. | Philosophy, modern. | Science %Philosophy. | Philosophy. | Philosophy of Science. | Modern Philosophy. | History of Science.
Tags from this library:
No tags from this library for this title.
Item type Location Call Number Status Date Due
E-Book E-Book AUM Main Library 501 (Browse Shelf) Not for loan

 Bohr and the Development of Quantum Theory: A Brief Review.- An Overview of Bohr’s  Complementarity.-  Prior Interpretations of Complementarity  -- A Philosophical-Historical Analysis of Complementarity.- Intersections with Hermeneutic Philosophy.-  Intersections with Derridean Deconstruction.-  Concluding Remarks  -- References.                                                                                                                                                                                                                             .

This book explores the modern physicist Niels Bohr’s philosophical thought, specifically his pivotal idea of complementarity, with a focus on the relation between the roles of what he metaphorically calls “spectators” and “actors.” It seeks to spell out the structural and historical complexity of the idea of complementarity in terms of different modes of the ‘spectator-actor’ relation, showing, in particular, that the reorganization of Bohr’s thought starting from his 1935 debate with Einstein and his collaborators is characterized by an extension of the dynamic conception of complementarity from non-physical contexts to the very field of quantum theory. Further, linked with this analysis, the book situates Bohr’s complementarity in contemporary philosophical context by examining its intersections with post-Heideggerian hermeneutics as well as Derridean deconstruction. Specifically, it points to both the close affinities and the differences between Bohr’s idea of the ‘actor-spectator’ relation and the hermeneutic notion of the relation between “belonging” and “distanciation.”

There are no comments for this item.

Log in to your account to post a comment.

Languages: 
English |
العربية